Falcons Tight end Kyle Pitts seems willing to surrender No. 8 to his new quarterback, Kirk Cousins
With quarterback Kirk Cousins heading to Atlanta, he’ll be curious about securing No. 8. The player who as of now has that number appears to be curious about surrendering it.
Tight conclusion Kyle Pitts, after posturing the address of who gets No. 8, posted an picture of himself from his days at Florida, where he wore No. 84. That appears to show a readiness by Pitts to grant up his number.
The issue came up final week, amid my visit with Pat McAfee and company. We talked almost our report that Cousins was making plans for a potential move to Atlanta. I said that we’d indeed listened, but not confirmed, that Cousins and Pitts were as of now talking almost whether Pitts will yield No. 8 to Cousins.
Pitts denied it at the time. I overlooked his dissent, for one exceptionally particular reason. Indeed in case it were genuine, he had to deny it. It’s the kind of dispute that, in case not denied, may start a altering examination.
Now, we all know that altering happens all the time, particularly within the days some time recently free office. But the NFL doesn’t overlook all of it. From time to time, the NFL whacks somebody. The more blatant the altering, the more likely the group that altered is to urge rebuffed. As I told McAfee and his colleagues final week, that portion was not confirmed. We never composed it here. Still, it’s not much distinctive than the stuff we did confirm — that Cousins and his spouse were trying to find a school for the kids and a house for the family within the region of the Birds of prey office.
A few appear to think that Cousins marking with the Hawks approves our report. I do not totally concur. We never detailed that Cousins was marking with the Birds of prey. We detailed that he was making arrangements to move his family to Atlanta, in case it came to that. Those realities would have been genuine whether he remained in Minnesota, marked with the Birds of prey, or picked any other group.
Of course, in case he’d remained in Minnesota, numerous would have fair accepted what we reported was off-base, citing it for the following year or two when one of our reports sums to “bad news” for their favorite group, or anything. And that’s fine. We are able as it were control how we display the data. We can’t control how it will be deciphered.
Leave a Reply